Correctional facility grease trap backups

When you deal with anything in life you must realize that more often than not. Things can be done cheaper and sometime better. For example, look at correctional facility grease trap backups. Can they be avoided? Could the establishment been built better to handle the massive amounts of fats, oils and grease that is accumulated throughout the facilities. When government projects are done now a days. Typically the private contractors tend to work on those jobs. They do this to lower the cost for the projects. It makes cense to use different means to achieve the desired goal that is intended.

It’s unavoidable for inmates to have squabbles. After all, they are confined in a place where they are all being watched and where they are all supposed to reform during the length of their sentence. The management of these correctional facilities should undergo supervision as they themselves watch over these inmates. The government has been evaluated before with regard to how they run the correctional facilities. It seems that until now, there is so much red tape going on that the needs of their correctional facilities are not met at once. An example is the construction of additional correctional facilities due to the increasing number of inmates through the years. It takes 5 to 6 long years before a single facility is finished. It is also much more expensive for them to make this happen. This is because of all the possible twists and turns that happen before the ground is even broken. The government people say that they have to consider environmental and moral aspects of the matter as well before they come up with a clear move. With this, the private companies offered their services to the government. There are now private companies that construct correctional facilities for their government clients at a much shorter period of time. Private companies have constructed prisons and jails in just five and a half months with a much lower cost compared to those by the government.

Whether they’re privately or publicly run, the correctional facilities all over the country still lack the proper management in terms of sanitation. The country is now experiencing a problem with FOG (fats, oils, grease). There are about 158 private correctional facilities in the United States. Compared to the government owned, there are only 52, 370 inmates that are housed by these private companies (Just subtract the figure from 1.7 M inmates in the US ). All these people, including the employees in each correctional facility, eat everyday. The correctional facility kitchens have hectic schedules in preparing the meals for everybody. As the correctional facility kitchens produce food at the same time, they also produce a lot of FOG (fats, oils, grease) simultaneously. This contributes a lot to the FOG crisis in the United States. To resolve this, the correctional facilities are mandated to follow the grease ordinance.

The ordinance requires the correctional facilities to have grease traps installed professionally in their areas of operation. These traps should be regularly inspected and maintained. They also have to be issued with legal permits. Proper care for these grease traps are needed to prevent correctional facility grease trap backups that cause detrimental health, sanitation, and environmental problems. When there is poor grease trap maintenance, FOG spills into the untreated effluent. The FOG solidifies and sticks to the inner walls of the sewer pipe, eventually clogging the pathway of the wastewater towards the treatment plant. This occurrence results to correctional facility grease trap backups.

Bacteria based additives should always be used in maintaining the grease traps. Through the help of these efficient FOG and solid waste digesters, the grease trap is completely cleared, even of foul smells. If the practice of using bacteria is maintained, there will be less frequent pump outs for the correctional facility. This will save the management a lot of money and a lot of headaches from the payment of fines and of expensive lawyers for defense against environmental lawsuits.